ritual

graha

soma cup drawing (graha)

The drawing and dedication of the soma draughts, cup by cup and deity by deity: the act the Vajasaneyi Samhita's seventh and eighth adhyayas are the formulary for, whose spoken words are "upayāmagṛhīto 'si" -- thou art taken with a support -- fifty-one times, all of them Yajurvedic. Distinct from the pressing, which is VG:CONCEPT:SOMA-PRESSING: VS 18.21 inventories the pressing gear and VS 18.19-20 inventories the twenty-four drawn cups, and the corpus keeps the two lists apart.

Supported

Open in the graph Ask about soma cup drawing (graha)

Corpus reach

Passages reached

Passages that reach this record through the lexical, conceptual or ritual predicates this surface counts.

Passages reached. Passages that reach this record through the lexical, conceptual or ritual predicates this surface counts.
Rigveda		1
Samaveda	Insufficient evidence	not established
Yajurveda		53
Atharvaveda		1

A null is not a zero: it means this object was not reached in that corpus by the lexical, conceptual or ritual predicates counted here. The mention layer's measured recall is 0.8857, so even a reached corpus is a lower bound.

Other names

grahaiḥgrahāgrahānupayāmagṛhīto

How this record was built3

AN INVENTORY OF 103 RITES, NOT A TAXONOMY. The Ritual class holds 103 nodes against a corpus that names considerably more, so a rank in this list is a rank within 103 and says nothing about Vedic ritual as a whole. Two step layers exist and they are not interchangeable. The Samhita layer holds 3 numbered steps in the entire graph, all on the soma pressing, whose morning, midday and third libations the text itself numbers. The procedural layer holds 3,121 steps over 103 rites, read out of Srautasutras and Grhyasutras rather than Samhita passages, and 94% of them state a position without printing the run it falls in -- so a procedure list is not a complete procedure. All 80 apparatus edges are TIER_D curation, and a rite's 'purpose' is what a curator says it is for, not a purpose clause quoted from a passage.
measured
`passage_count` counts DISTINCT passages reaching the object through the lexical, conceptual and ritual predicates this surface counts, and is the same figure the detail view reports. It is NULL, never 0, where no passage reaches it: the mention layer's measured recall is 0.8857, so a null is a lower bound and not an assertion that the corpus is silent.
measured
`co_mentioned` is CO-OCCURRENCE WITHIN A MANTRA and nothing more. It carries no causal, prescriptive or pharmacological claim: a plant named beside an affliction is named beside it, and apamarga is named against sorcery rather than against a cough. `neighbours` holds the curated edges, which are a different strength of claim; the two are separate fields so they cannot be read as one.
measured

Direct relationships

Named in the same verses