sá tváṃ naś citra vajrahasta dhr̥ṣṇuyā́ mahá stavānó adrivaḥ |
gā́m áśvaṃ rathyàm indra sáṃ kira satrā́ vā́jaṃ ná jigyúṣe ||2||
As such, O Wonderful whose hand holds thunder, praised as mighty, Caster of the Stone. Pour on us boldly, Indra, kie and chariot-steeds, ever to be the conqueror's strength.
As such, O Wonderful, whose hand holds thunder, praised as mighty, Caster of the Stone! Pour on us boldly, Indra, kine and chariotsteeds, ever to be the conqueror's strength.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
The surface that matched
Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.
sá tváṃ naś citra vajrahasta dhr̥ṣṇuyā́ mahá stavānó adrivaḥ |
gā́m áśvaṃ rathyàm indra sáṃ kira satrā́ vā́jaṃ ná jigyúṣe ||2||
As such, O Wonderful whose hand holds thunder, praised as mighty, Caster of the Stone. Pour on us boldly, Indra, kie and chariot-steeds, ever to be the conqueror's strength.
स त्वं न॑श्चित्र वज्रहस्त धृष्णु॒या म॒ह स्त॑वा॒नो अ॑द्रिवः । गामश्व॑ᳪं᳭ र॒थ्य॒मिन्द्र॒ सं कि॑र स॒त्रा वाजं॒ न जि॒ग्युषे॑ ।। ३८ ।।
As such, O Wonderful, whose hand holds thunder, praised
as mighty, Caster of the Stone!
Pour on us boldly, Indra, kine and chariot-steeds ever to be
the conqueror's strength.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
The surface that matched
Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.
sá tváṃ naś citra vajrahasta dhr̥ṣṇuyā́ mahá stavānó adrivaḥ |
gā́m áśvaṃ rathyàm indra sáṃ kira satrā́ vā́jaṃ ná jigyúṣe ||2||
As such, O Wonderful whose hand holds thunder, praised as mighty, Caster of the Stone. Pour on us boldly, Indra, kie and chariot-steeds, ever to be the conqueror's strength.
स त्वं नश्चित्र वज्रहस्त धृष्णुया मह स्तवानो अद्रिवः । गामश्वं रथ्यमिन्द्र सं किर सत्रा वाजं न जिग्युषे
No English rendering is linked to this passage.
The surface that matched
Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.
These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.
Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.
How these were derived2
Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.
measured
SHARES_ENTITY_VOCABULARY_WITH is not textual parallelism. It means two passages name some of the same registry concepts and says nothing about shared wording, so it is reported with relation_kind=ENTITY_VOCABULARY_OVERLAP and is excluded from textual_total.