All ritual ritual
citi fire altar piling (citi)
The piling up of Agni out of bricks, named by the Samhita as an act and not by a rite-name: Agni is addressed as `cīyamānaḥ`, "while thou art being piled" (VS 13.41, VS 13.47), the sacrificer as `cinvānaḥ`, "piling" (VS 13.47 and four parallels), and the bricks are addressed as bricks and called milch-cows at VS 17.2. The name `agnicayana` is absent from all four Samhitas and is not used here. `cinvānas` is read evidence but not an alias: it occurs only across a token boundary (`cinvānas tanvo`), and SANDHI_MATCH_VEDAS restricts the production substring pass to the Samaveda, so the string would fire nowhere.
Corpus reach Passages reached Passages that reach this record through the lexical, conceptual or ritual predicates this surface counts.
Passages reached. Passages that reach this record through the lexical, conceptual or ritual predicates this surface counts. Rigveda not established Samaveda not established Yajurveda 2 Atharvaveda not established
A null is not a zero: it means this object was not reached in that corpus by the lexical, conceptual or ritual predicates counted here. The mention layer's measured recall is 0.8857, so even a reached corpus is a lower bound.
3 AN INVENTORY OF 103 RITES, NOT A TAXONOMY. The Ritual class holds 103 nodes against a corpus that names considerably more, so a rank in this list is a rank within 103 and says nothing about Vedic ritual as a whole. Two step layers exist and they are not interchangeable. The Samhita layer holds 3 numbered steps in the entire graph, all on the soma pressing, whose morning, midday and third libations the text itself numbers. The procedural layer holds 3,121 steps over 103 rites, read out of Srautasutras and Grhyasutras rather than Samhita passages, and 94% of them state a position without printing the run it falls in -- so a procedure list is not a complete procedure. All 80 apparatus edges are TIER_D curation, and a rite's 'purpose' is what a curator says it is for, not a purpose clause quoted from a passage.
measured `passage_count` counts DISTINCT passages reaching the object through the lexical, conceptual and ritual predicates this surface counts, and is the same figure the detail view reports. It is NULL, never 0, where no passage reaches it: the mention layer's measured recall is 0.8857, so a null is a lower bound and not an assertion that the corpus is silent.
measured `co_mentioned` is CO-OCCURRENCE WITHIN A MANTRA and nothing more. It carries no causal, prescriptive or pharmacological claim: a plant named beside an affliction is named beside it, and apamarga is named against sorcery rather than against a cough. `neighbours` holds the curated edges, which are a different strength of claim; the two are separate fields so they cannot be read as one.
measured