parī̱to ṣi̍ñcatā su̱taṁ somo̱ ya u̍tta̱maṁ ha̱viḥ | da̱dha̱nvām̐ yo naryo̍ a̱psv a1̱̍ntar ā su̱ṣāva̱ soma̱m adri̍bhiḥ ||
HENCE sprinkle forth the juice effused, Soma, the best of sacred gifts, Who, friend of man, hath run amid the water-streams. He hath pressed Soma out with stones.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
The surface that matched
Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.
परी॒तो षि॑ञ्च॒ता सु॒तᳪं᳭ सोमो॒ य उ॑त्त॒मᳪं᳭ ह॒विः । द॒ध॒न्वा यो नर्यो॑ अ॒प्स्वन्तरा सु॒षाव॒ सोम॒मद्रि॑भिः ।। २ ।।
Hence pour ye forth the flowing juice, Soma, best Sacrificial
food.
He who, man's friend, hath run within the waters hath with
the pressing-stones poured out the Soma.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
The surface that matched
Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.
These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.
Samaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.
How these were derived2
Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.
measured
SHARES_ENTITY_VOCABULARY_WITH is not textual parallelism. It means two passages name some of the same registry concepts and says nothing about shared wording, so it is reported with relation_kind=ENTITY_VOCABULARY_OVERLAP and is excluded from textual_total.