ku̱vid a̱ṅga yava̍manto̱ yava̍ṁ ci̱d yathā̱ dānty a̍nupū̱rvaṁ vi̱yūya̍ | i̱hehai̍ṣāṁ kṛṇuhi̱ bhoja̍nāni̱ ye ba̱rhiṣo̱ namo̍vṛkti̱ṁ na ja̱gmuḥ ||
What then? As men whose fields are full of barley reap the ripe corn removing it in order, So bring the food of those men, bring it hither, who went not to prepare the grass for worship.
What then? As men whose fields are full of barley reap the ripe corn removing it in order, So bring the food of those men, bring it hither, who come not to prepare the grass for worship.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
The surface that matched
Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.
kuvid aṅga yavamanto yavaṃ cid yathā dānty anupūrvaṃ viyūya ihehaiṣāṃ kṛṇuhi bhojanāni ye barhiṣo namovṛktiṃ na jagmuḥ
ku̱vid a̱ṅga yava̍manto̱ yava̍ṁ ci̱d yathā̱ dānty a̍nupū̱rvaṁ vi̱yūya̍ | i̱hehai̍ṣāṁ kṛṇuhi̱ bhoja̍nāni̱ ye ba̱rhiṣo̱ namo̍vṛkti̱ṁ na ja̱gmuḥ ||
What then? As men whose fields are full of barley reap the ripe corn removing it in order, So bring the food of those men, bring it hither, who went not to prepare the grass for worship.
These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.
Rigveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.
How these were derived1
Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.