Skip to content
VedAnvaya
Search
Back to RV 10.97.10

Shared wording with RV 10.97.10

The same verse as it stands in two collections, with the surface that matched and the evidence behind the link.

Variant

RV 10.97.10VSM 12.84

The same verse with edition-level differences.

Partial coverage
RigvedaRV 10.97.10

ati̱ viśvā̍ḥ pari̱ṣṭhāḥ ste̱na i̍va vra̱jam a̍kramuḥ | oṣa̍dhī̱ḥ prācu̍cyavu̱r yat kiṁ ca̍ ta̱nvo̱3̱̍ rapa̍ḥ ||

Over all fences have they passed, as steals a thief into the fold. The Plants have driven from the frame whatever malady was there.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
YajurvedaVSM 12.84

अति॒ विश्वा॑: परि॒ष्ठाः स्ते॒न इ॑व व्र॒जम॑क्रमुः । ओष॑धी॒: प्राचु॑च्यवु॒र्यत्किं च॑ त॒न्वो रप॑: ।। ८४ ।।

Over all fences have they passed, as steals a thief into the fold. The Plants have driven from the frame whatever malady was there.
Ralph T. H. Griffith

The surface that matched

Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.

ativiśvāḥpariṣṭhāḥstenaivavrajamakramuḥoṣadhīḥprācucyavuryatkiṃcatanvorapaḥ

Evidence for this link

Relationship classes
Variant
Match level
Matched after sandhi folding
Knowledge grade
Derived
How it was established
Derived by rule
Overlap
100% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction
RV 10.97.10 is the subject of the stored edge
Technical details

Method: crossveda-parallels:identity:SANDHI_INSENSITIVE

Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED

Review state: ACCEPTED

Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:7a596df0b0e87c216585dd726d5b6a84

What a match here does and does not show

These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.

Rigveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.

How these were derived2

  • Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.

    measured

  • SHARES_ENTITY_VOCABULARY_WITH is not textual parallelism. It means two passages name some of the same registry concepts and says nothing about shared wording, so it is reported with relation_kind=ENTITY_VOCABULARY_OVERLAP and is excluded from textual_total.

    measured