so a̱gnir yo vasu̍r gṛ̱ṇe saṁ yam ā̱yanti̍ dhe̱nava̍ḥ | sam arva̍nto raghu̱druva̱ḥ saṁ su̍jā̱tāsa̍ḥ sū̱raya̱ iṣa̍ṁ sto̱tṛbhya̱ ā bha̍ra ||
'Tis Agni whom we laud as good, to whom the milch-kine come in herds, To whom the chargers swift of foot, to whom our well-born princes come. Bring food to those who sing thy praise.
सो अ॒ग्निर्यो वसु॑र्गृ॒णे सं यमा॒यन्ति॑ धे॒नव॑: । समर्व॑न्तो रघु॒द्रुव॒: सᳪं᳭ सु॑जा॒तास॑: सू॒रय॒ इष॑ᳪं᳭ स्तो॒तृभ्य॒ आ भ॑र ।। ४२ ।।
’Tis Agni whom we laud as good, to whom the milch-kine
come in herds,
To whom the coursers swift of foot, to whom our well-born
princes come. Bring food to those who sing thy praise.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
The surface that matched
Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.
so a̱gnir yo vasu̍r gṛ̱ṇe saṁ yam ā̱yanti̍ dhe̱nava̍ḥ | sam arva̍nto raghu̱druva̱ḥ saṁ su̍jā̱tāsa̍ḥ sū̱raya̱ iṣa̍ṁ sto̱tṛbhya̱ ā bha̍ra ||
'Tis Agni whom we laud as good, to whom the milch-kine come in herds, To whom the chargers swift of foot, to whom our well-born princes come. Bring food to those who sing thy praise.
सो अग्निर्यो वसुर्गृणे सं यमायन्ति धेनवः । समर्वन्तो रघुद्रुवः सं सुजातासः सूरय इषं स्तोतृभ्य आ भर
No English rendering is linked to this passage.
The surface that matched
Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.
These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.
Rigveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.
How these were derived2
Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.
measured
SHARES_ENTITY_VOCABULARY_WITH is not textual parallelism. It means two passages name some of the same registry concepts and says nothing about shared wording, so it is reported with relation_kind=ENTITY_VOCABULARY_OVERLAP and is excluded from textual_total.