tā́ asya námasā sáhaḥ saparyánti prácetasaḥ |
vratā́ny asya saścire purū́ṇi pūrvácittaye vásvīr ánu svarā́jyam ||3||
With veneration, passing wise, honouring his victorious might, They follow close his many laws to win them due preeminence, good in their own supremacy.
With veneration, passing wise, honouring his victorious might, They follow close his many laws to win them due preeminence, good in their own supremacy.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
The surface that matched
Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.
tā asya namasā sahaḥ saparyanti pracetasaḥ vratāny asya saścire purūṇi pūrvacittaye vasvīr anu svarājyam
tā́ asya námasā sáhaḥ saparyánti prácetasaḥ |
vratā́ny asya saścire purū́ṇi pūrvácittaye vásvīr ánu svarā́jyam ||3||
With veneration, passing wise, honouring his victorious might, They follow close his many laws to win them due preeminence, good in their own supremacy.
These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.
Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.
How these were derived1
Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.