Skip to content
VedAnvaya
Search
Back to AVS 20.96.12

Shared wording with AVS 20.96.12

The same verse as it stands in two collections, with the surface that matched and the evidence behind the link.

Parallel wording

AVS 20.96.12RV 10.162.2

Closely similar wording in both passages.

Partial coverage
AtharvavedaAVS 20.96.12

yás te gárbham ámīvā durṇā́mā yónim āśáye | agníṣ ṭáṃ bráhmaṇā sahá níṣ kravyā́dam anīnaśat ||12||

Agni, concurring in the prayer, drive off the eater of thy flesh, The malady of evil name that hath attacked thy babe and womb.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
RigvedaRV 10.162.2

yas te̱ garbha̱m amī̍vā du̱rṇāmā̱ yoni̍m ā̱śaye̍ | a̱gniṣ ṭam brahma̍ṇā sa̱ha niṣ kra̱vyāda̍m anīnaśat ||

Agni, concurring in the prayer, drive off the eater of the flesh, The malady of evil name that hath attacked thy babe and womb.
Ralph T. H. Griffith

The surface that matched

Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.

yastegarbhamamīvādurṇāmāyonimāśayeagniṣṭaṃbrahmaṇāsahaniṣkravyādamanīnaśat

Evidence for this link

Relationship classes
Parallel wording
Match level
Match level not recorded
Knowledge grade
Derived
How it was established
Derived by rule
Overlap
89% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction
AVS 20.96.12 is the subject of the stored edge
Technical details

Method: crossveda-parallels:near:minhash-char4+lcs:SANDHI_INSENSITIVE

Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED

Review state: ACCEPTED

Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:88108587317e1055bfa65155b1e2c3df

What a match here does and does not show

These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.

Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.

How these were derived2

  • Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.

    measured

  • SHARES_ENTITY_VOCABULARY_WITH is not textual parallelism. It means two passages name some of the same registry concepts and says nothing about shared wording, so it is reported with relation_kind=ENTITY_VOCABULARY_OVERLAP and is excluded from textual_total.

    measured