Skip to content
VedAnvaya
Search
Back to AVS 20.71.4

Shared wording with AVS 20.71.4

The same verse as it stands in two collections, with the surface that matched and the evidence behind the link.

Parallel wording

AVS 20.71.4RV 1.8.8

Closely similar wording in both passages.

Partial coverage
AtharvavedaAVS 20.71.4

evā́ hy àsya sūnŕ̥tā virapśī́ gómatī mahī́ | pakvā́ śā́khā ná dāśúṣe ||4||

So also is his excellence, great, vigorous, rich in cattle, like A ripe branch to the worshipper.
Ralph T. H. Griffith

English rendering reused from the Rigvedic parallel of RV 1.8.8. The Sanskrit of the two passages is verified identical; this is not an independent translation of this verse's own corpus.

RigvedaRV 1.8.8

e̱vā hy a̍sya sū̱nṛtā̍ vira̱pśī goma̍tī ma̱hī | pa̱kvā śākhā̱ na dā̱śuṣe̍ ||

So also is his excellence, great, vigorous, rich in cattle, like A ripe branch to the worshipper.
Ralph T. H. Griffith

The surface that matched

Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.

evā hy asya sūnṛtā virapśī gomatī mahī pakvā śākhā na dāśuṣe

Evidence for this link

Relationship classes
Parallel wording
Match level
Script folded
Knowledge grade
Derived
How it was established
Derived by rule
Overlap
100% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction
AVS 20.71.4 is the subject of the stored edge
Technical details

Method: crossveda-parallels:identity:SCRIPT_FOLDED

Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED

Review state: ACCEPTED

Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:e909f73351cf6dbe0c9472436f8107de

What a match here does and does not show

These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.

Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.

How these were derived1

  • Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.

    measured