vārtra̍hatyāya̱ śava̍se pṛtanā̱ṣāhyā̍ya ca | indra̱ tvā va̍rtayāmasi ||
O INDRA, for the strength that slays Vrtra and conquers in the fight, We turn thee hitherward to us.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
The surface that matched
Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.
vārtrahatyāya śavase pṛtanāṣāhyāya ca indra tvā vartayāmasi
वार्त्र॑हत्याय॒ शव॑से पृतना॒षाह्या॑य च । इन्द्र॒ त्वाऽऽव॑र्तयामसि ।। ६८ ।।
O Indra, for the strength that slays Vritra and conquers in
the fight
We torn thee hitherward to us.
Ralph T. H. Griffith
The surface that matched
Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.
vārtrahatyāya śavase pṛtanāṣāhyāya ca indra tvā vartayāmasi
These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.
Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.
How these were derived1
Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.