Skip to content
VedAnvaya
Back to AVS 19.6.7

Shared wording with AVS 19.6.7

The same verse as it stands in two collections, with the surface that matched and the evidence behind the link.

Parallel wording

AVS 19.6.7RV 10.90.13

Closely similar wording in both passages.

Partial coverage
AtharvavedaAVS 19.6.7

candrámā mánaso jātáś cákṣoḥ sū́ryo ajāyata | múkhād índraś cāgníś ca prāṇā́d vāyúr ajāyata ||7||

The moon [is] born from his mind; from his eye the sun was born; from his mouth both Indra and Agni; from his breath Vāyu was born.
William Dwight Whitney (revised and edited by Charles Rockwell Lanman)

ca̱ndramā̱ mana̍so jā̱taś cakṣo̱ḥ sūryo̍ ajāyata | mukhā̱d indra̍ś cā̱gniś ca̍ prā̱ṇād vā̱yur a̍jāyata ||

The Moon was gendered from his mind, and from his eye the Sun had birth; Indra and Agni from his mouth were born, and Vayu from his breath.
Ralph T. H. Griffith

The surface that matched

Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.

candramā manaso jātaś cakṣoḥ sūryo ajāyata mukhād indraś cāgniś ca prāṇād vāyur ajāyata

Evidence for this link

Relationship classes
Parallel wording
Match level
Accent insensitive
Knowledge grade
Derived
How it was established
Derived by rule
Overlap
100% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction
AVS 19.6.7 is the subject of the stored edge
Technical details

Method: crossveda-parallels:identity:ACCENT_INSENSITIVE

Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED

Review state: ACCEPTED

Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:f44f03339a293c98baed5f60e3834d98

What a match here does and does not show

These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.

Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.

How these were derived2
  • Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.

    measured
  • SHARES_ENTITY_VOCABULARY_WITH is not textual parallelism. It means two passages name some of the same registry concepts and says nothing about shared wording, so it is reported with relation_kind=ENTITY_VOCABULARY_OVERLAP and is excluded from textual_total.

    measured