Shared wording with AVS 18.1.56 The same verse as it stands in two collections, with the surface that matched and the evidence behind the link.
uśántas tvedhīmahy uśántaḥ sám idhīmahi |
uśánn uśatá ā́ vaha pitr̥̄́n havíṣe áttave ||56||
Eager (''uçánt'') would we light thee, eager would we kindle; do thou, eager, bring the eager Fathers to eat the oblation. William Dwight Whitney (revised and edited by Charles Rockwell Lanman) u̱śanta̍s tvā̱ ni dhī̍mahy u̱śanta̱ḥ sam i̍dhīmahi | u̱śann u̍śa̱ta ā va̍ha pi̱tṝn ha̱viṣe̱ atta̍ve ||
Right gladly would we set thee down, right gladly make thee burn and glow. Gladly bring yearning Fathers nigh to cat the food of sacrifice. Ralph T. H. Griffith The surface that matched Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.
uśantastvedhīmahyuśantaḥsamidhīmahiuśannuśataāvahapitṝnhaviṣeattaveEvidence for this link
Relationship classes Parallel wording
Match level Match level not recorded
Knowledge grade Derived
How it was established Derived by rule
Overlap 85% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction AVS 18.1.56 is the subject of the stored edge Technical details Method: crossveda-parallels:near:minhash-char4+lcs:SANDHI_INSENSITIVE
Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED
Review state: ACCEPTED
Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:c1a556fb69847a1deaa662e17ff255fd
uśántas tvedhīmahy uśántaḥ sám idhīmahi |
uśánn uśatá ā́ vaha pitr̥̄́n havíṣe áttave ||56||
Eager (''uçánt'') would we light thee, eager would we kindle; do thou, eager, bring the eager Fathers to eat the oblation. William Dwight Whitney (revised and edited by Charles Rockwell Lanman) उ॒शन्त॑स्त्वा॒ नि धी॑मह्यु॒शन्त॒: समि॑धीमहि । उ॒शन्नु॑श॒त आ व॑ह पि॒तॄन् ह॒विषे॒ अत्त॑वे ।। ७० ।।
Right gladly do we set thee down, right gladly make thee
burn and glow.
Gladly bring yearning Fathers nigh to eat the food of
sacrifice. Ralph T. H. Griffith The surface that matched Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.
uśantastvedhīmahyuśantaḥsamidhīmahiuśannuśataāvahapitṝnhaviṣeattaveEvidence for this link
Relationship classes Parallel wording
Match level Match level not recorded
Knowledge grade Derived
How it was established Derived by rule
Overlap 85% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction AVS 18.1.56 is the subject of the stored edge Technical details Method: crossveda-parallels:near:minhash-char4+lcs:SANDHI_INSENSITIVE
Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED
Review state: ACCEPTED
Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:647ee190b6c5d2e00d6eba077d02b135
What a match here does and does not show These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.
Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.
1 Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.
measured