Skip to content
VedAnvaya
Back to AVS 8.1.20

Shared wording with AVS 8.1.20

The same verse as it stands in two collections, with the surface that matched and the evidence behind the link.

Parallel wording

AVS 8.1.20RV 10.161.5

Closely similar wording in both passages.

Partial coverage
AtharvavedaAVS 8.1.20

ā́hārṣam ávidaṃ tvā púnar ā́gāḥ púnarṇavaḥ | sárvāṅga sárvaṃ te cákṣuḥ sárvam ā́yuś ca te 'vidam ||20||

I have taken, I have found thee; thou hast come back renewed; whole-limbed one! I have found thy whole sight, and thy whole life-time.
William Dwight Whitney (revised and edited by Charles Rockwell Lanman)

āhā̍rṣa̱ṁ tvāvi̍daṁ tvā̱ puna̱r āgā̍ḥ punarnava | sarvā̍ṅga̱ sarva̍ṁ te̱ cakṣu̱ḥ sarva̱m āyu̍ś ca te 'vidam ||

So have I found and rescued thee thou hast returned with youth renewed. Whole in thy members! I have found thy sight and all thy life for thee.
Ralph T. H. Griffith

The surface that matched

Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.

āhārṣamavidaṃtvāpunarāgāḥpunarṇavaḥsarvāṅgasarvaṃtecakṣuḥsarvamāyuścatevidam

Evidence for this link

Relationship classes
Parallel wording
Match level
Match level not recorded
Knowledge grade
Derived
How it was established
Derived by rule
Overlap
70% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction
AVS 8.1.20 is the subject of the stored edge
Technical details

Method: crossveda-parallels:near:minhash-char4+lcs:SANDHI_INSENSITIVE

Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED

Review state: ACCEPTED

Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:cbb0e5abc541d64d3dba00f8af8606c3

What a match here does and does not show

These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.

Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.

How these were derived1
  • Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.

    measured