Skip to content
VedAnvaya
Search
Back to AVS 6.64.1

Shared wording with AVS 6.64.1

The same verse as it stands in two collections, with the surface that matched and the evidence behind the link.

Parallel wording

AVS 6.64.1RV 10.191.2

Closely similar wording in both passages.

Partial coverage
AtharvavedaAVS 6.64.1

sáṃ jānīdhvaṃ sáṃ pr̥cyadhvaṃ sáṃ vo mánāṃsi jānatām | devā́ bhāgáṃ yáthā pū́rve samjānānā́ upā́sate ||1||

Do ye concur; be ye closely combined; let your minds be concurrent, as the gods of old sat concurrent about their portion.
William Dwight Whitney (revised and edited by Charles Rockwell Lanman)
RigvedaRV 10.191.2

saṁ ga̍cchadhva̱ṁ saṁ va̍dadhva̱ṁ saṁ vo̱ manā̍ṁsi jānatām | de̱vā bhā̱gaṁ yathā̱ pūrve̍ saṁjānā̱nā u̱pāsa̍te ||

Assemble, speak together: let your minds be all of one accord, As ancient Gods unanimous sit down to their appointed share.
Ralph T. H. Griffith

The surface that matched

Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.

saṃjānīdhvaṃsaṃpṛcyadhvaṃsaṃvomanāṃsijānatāmdevābhāgaṃyathāpūrvesamjānānāupāsate

Evidence for this link

Relationship classes
Parallel wording
Match level
Match level not recorded
Knowledge grade
Derived
How it was established
Derived by rule
Overlap
67% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction
AVS 6.64.1 is the subject of the stored edge
Technical details

Method: crossveda-parallels:near:minhash-char4+lcs:SANDHI_INSENSITIVE

Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED

Review state: ACCEPTED

Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:38a92a71d3c314a166f58a0307e99898

What a match here does and does not show

These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.

Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.

How these were derived1

  • Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.

    measured