Skip to content
VedAnvaya
Back to AVS 5.25.5

Shared wording with AVS 5.25.5

The same verse as it stands in two collections, with the surface that matched and the evidence behind the link.

Parallel wording

AVS 5.25.5RV 10.184.1

Closely similar wording in both passages.

Partial coverage
AtharvavedaAVS 5.25.5

víṣṇur yóniṃ kalpayatu tváṣṭā rūpā́ṇi piṃśatu | ā́ siñcatu prajā́patir dhātā́ gárbhaṃ dadhātu te ||5||

Let Vishṇu prepare the womb (''yóni''); let Tvashṭar adorn the forms; let Prajāpati pour on; let Dhātar place thine embryo.
William Dwight Whitney (revised and edited by Charles Rockwell Lanman)

viṣṇu̱r yoni̍ṁ kalpayatu̱ tvaṣṭā̍ rū̱pāṇi̍ piṁśatu | ā si̍ñcatu pra̱jāpa̍tir dhā̱tā garbha̍ṁ dadhātu te ||

MAY Visnu form and mould the womb, may Tvastar duly shape the forms, Prajapati infuse the stream, and Dhatar lay the germ for thee.
Ralph T. H. Griffith

The surface that matched

Both passages fold to the same comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison, so this string is not how either text reads.

viṣṇur yoniṃ kalpayatu tvaṣṭā rūpāṇi piṃśatu ā siñcatu prajāpatir dhātā garbhaṃ dadhātu te

Evidence for this link

Relationship classes
Parallel wording
Match level
Script folded
Knowledge grade
Derived
How it was established
Derived by rule
Overlap
100% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction
AVS 5.25.5 is the subject of the stored edge
Technical details

Method: crossveda-parallels:identity:SCRIPT_FOLDED

Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED

Review state: ACCEPTED

Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:7cd0c7287f963298b424ec982dc2645a

What a match here does and does not show

These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.

Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.

How these were derived1
  • Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.

    measured