Skip to content
VedAnvaya
Search
Back to AVS 3.20.4

Shared wording with AVS 3.20.4

The same verse as it stands in two collections, with the surface that matched and the evidence behind the link.

Parallel wording

AVS 3.20.4RV 10.141.3

Closely similar wording in both passages.

Partial coverage
AtharvavedaAVS 3.20.4

sómaṃ rā́jānam ávase 'gníṃ gīrbhír havāmahe | ādityám víṣṇum sū́ryaṃ brahmā́ṇaṃ ca bŕ̥haspátim ||4||

King Soma [and] Agni we call to aid with [our] songs (''gír''); [also] Āditya, Vishṇu, Sūrya, and the priest (''brahmán'') Brihaspati.
William Dwight Whitney (revised and edited by Charles Rockwell Lanman)
RigvedaRV 10.141.3

soma̱ṁ rājā̍na̱m ava̍se̱ 'gniṁ gī̱rbhir ha̍vāmahe | ā̱di̱tyān viṣṇu̱ṁ sūrya̍m bra̱hmāṇa̍ṁ ca̱ bṛha̱spati̍m ||

We call King Soma to our aid, and Agni with our songs and hymns, Adityas, Visnu, Surya, and the Brahman Priest Brhaspati.
Ralph T. H. Griffith

The surface that matched

Each passage folds to its own comparison surface. Accents, word breaks and sandhi are removed before comparison.

somaṃrājānamavasegniṃgīrbhirhavāmaheādityamviṣṇumsūryaṃbrahmāṇaṃcabṛhaspatim

Evidence for this link

Relationship classes
Parallel wording
Match level
Match level not recorded
Knowledge grade
Derived
How it was established
Derived by rule
Overlap
70% of character n-grams shared
Stored direction
AVS 3.20.4 is the subject of the stored edge
Technical details

Method: crossveda-parallels:near:minhash-char4+lcs:SANDHI_INSENSITIVE

Knowledge layer: L2_DETERMINISTIC_DERIVED

Review state: ACCEPTED

Relationship id: VG:ENRICH:PARALLEL:638976a895aa92be498fdd493ea5d3b9

What a match here does and does not show

These links are derived by comparing normalised Sanskrit surfaces. They show that two collections carry the same wording. They are not, by themselves, a demonstrated line of transmission between them, and the direction stored on an edge is a property of how it was built.

Atharvaveda is one of four collections held here. Cross-corpus comparison bottoms out at the weakest shared surface, because a Devanagari text and a romanised text share no code points.

How these were derived2

  • Parallelism is symmetric and this graph stores it as a directed edge, so these relations are traversed in both directions and each row states which way the stored edge ran. All 1,684 REUSES_TEXT_FROM edges point Samaveda-to-Rigveda, and 1,421 Rigvedic passages have reuse edges only inbound; following the arrow would show those 1,421 verses no reuse at all.

    measured

  • SHARES_ENTITY_VOCABULARY_WITH is not textual parallelism. It means two passages name some of the same registry concepts and says nothing about shared wording, so it is reported with relation_kind=ENTITY_VOCABULARY_OVERLAP and is excluded from textual_total.

    measured